Occupational Licensure Will Now Be Regularly Reviewed

Occupational licenses, affectionately known as government permission slips, are a common source of frustration for many Utahns. 

It is not uncommon to know someone, maybe even a family member, who is qualified enough to perform a certain job but is unable to do so because of suffocating government restrictions. 

Just consider this hypothetical: your brother is a talented barber, and he has been cutting hair for years, yours included. Your brother is a responsible person, and people keep coming back to him to get their hair cut as he does an exceptional job. 

In Utah, despite your brother clearly being a talented barber, he would be unable to find work at a barbershop due to occupational licenses. 

This wholly plausible hypothetical illustrates how these laws that were originally intended to protect consumers and businesses are actually harming the economy and reducing choice for consumers.

Luckily, Utahns can expect to see some of Utah’s most egregious occupational licenses taken off the books in the upcoming years. 

Senate Bill 16, sponsored by Senator Curtis Bramble, passed the state Legislature during the 2022 legislative session and will become an avenue to make sure that poor occupational licenses do not remain in effect.

This bill will create the Occupational and Professional Licensure Review Office. This office will work to ensure that unnecessary occupational licenses are not put on the books and that existing occupational licenses are reviewed.    

As an avenue for a more predictable and stable process for licensing reform, this office has an absolutely necessary function. 

We commend Senator Bramble for championing occupational licensure reform, like Senate Bill 16, across the state.

Author Profile Image
About the author

Ben Shelton

Ben was a Policy Associate at Libertas Institute.

Share Post:

Fighting for a Future Where Individuals Are Fully Liberated to Pursue Their Dreams, Free from Coercion and Control.

You Might Also Like

Investing in the stock market, for example, also involves risk-taking, yet it is generally regulated as investing rather than gambling. This naturally raises the question: Where should regulators draw the line between investing and gambling?
Beyond opening doors, a doorman provides a visible human presence, assists guests, monitors activity around the entrance, and discourages disruptive behavior. Those functions may be difficult to quantify, but they are nevertheless part of the value that the job creates.
The Milwaukee Police Department didn’t catch it.  One of the people he was tracking did, by typing her own plate into a website called HaveIBeenFlocked.com and seeing the search history. Then she complained.

Help us Nail and Scale Policies to Reduce Government Control

Your tax-deductible contributions to Libertas Institute increase freedom across the country.