HB292: Violating the Right of Contract for “Payday Lenders”

This bill was modified from its original version to remove the offending provisions, and passed successfully in both chambers of the legislature.

According to The Salt Lake Tribune, 45,655 Utahns struggled to pay back their high-interest payday loans last year. These lenders, required to report the data to the state, disclosed that the average loan carried a whopping 482% annual interest.

In a recent op-ed on this issue, Representative Brad Daw—who has attempted for several years to impose tighter regulations on this industry (see here and here)—argued for restrictions on how many loans payday lenders could offer to a single person. Calling his proposal an “effective deterrent to irresponsible lending,” Rep. Daw correctly noted that the “payday lending industry has spent hundreds of thousands of dollars lobbying against such regulation.”

That regulation has resurfaced in House Bill 292, which would require the Utah Department of Financial Institutions to create a central database to monitor all “payday loans” issued in the state. The law would prohibit lenders from providing a loan to a person who already has two loans. Borrowers would also be prohibited from taking out loans that exceed 25% of their gross monthly income.

Payday lenders who provide a loan to an “ineligible” borrower would be guilty of a class B misdemeanor under the proposed bill.

While we are concerned with predatory practices and the poor money management of low-income individuals throughout the state, we reject the notion that taxpayers should be required to fund the creation and management of a database, and a regulatory enforcement practice, that violates the right of contract of both borrower and lender.

Utah’s “nanny state” extends to multiple spheres, including meddling in the voluntary, contractual, and consensual relationship of adults exchanging money under mutually agreeable terms. While education may help to encourage better borrowing practices, the government should not use the force of law to prevent people from making bad decisions.

About the author

Libertas Institute Staff

Share Post:

Fighting for a Future Where Individuals Are Fully Liberated to Pursue Their Dreams, Free from Coercion and Control.

You Might Also Like

This bill reduces barriers to entry in the cosmetology and beauty industry while maintaining consumer choice.
This bill ensures that Utah’s medicinal psilocybin and MDMA pilot program can move forward by allowing qualified healthcare providers to participate after the initial healthcare systems declined to do so.
This bill provides for improved guardrails and oversight of automatic license plate readers used and accessed by law enforcement and transportation management.

Help us Nail and Scale Policies to Reduce Government Control

Your tax-deductible contributions to Libertas Institute increase freedom across the country.

Libertas Institute
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.