Government Accountability for Causing Individuals Harm

Authored by Molly Davis, Policy Analyst, Criminal Justice Policy Analyst

Should a person be held liable for damages if they harm you? The answer is a resounding yes. However, while individuals can hold one another accountable in court, the government is held to a far lower legal standard than any private individual—if it’s held to one at all. This is because in many cases, the state shields itself from being held liable for any wrongdoing.

Long before America existed, English common law relied on a principle of rex non potest peccare, that is, “the King can do no wrong.” This principle has been implemented by American governments at all levels, making it difficult for anyone to successfully sue the government.

Cases against the government are regularly thrown out by judges due to government’s imperialistic immunity. In Utah, if the government is actually held accountable, justice is artificially limited due to caps on compensation. Those harmed by their government face a profound injustice due to immunity laws—and for that reason, the laws need to change.

About the author

Libertas Institute Staff

Share Post:

Fighting for a Future Where Individuals Are Fully Liberated to Pursue Their Dreams, Free from Coercion and Control.

You Might Also Like

Higher education should generally be shorter, cheaper, and transparent. Alternatives should be promoted as viable options.
Policymakers can safeguard workers by investing in innovation—reskilling, flexible work models, and AI collaboration—to turn disruption into opportunity.
Local officials can provide relief to aspiring homeowners by passing an ordinance that legalizes attached and detached Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs).

Help us Nail and Scale Policies to Reduce Government Control

Your tax-deductible contributions to Libertas Institute increase freedom across the country.