The High Price of Retribution: A Case for Repealing the Death Penalty

Authored by Josh Daniels, Director of Policy

In 2015, the Utah Legislature reauthorized the use of the firing squad as a form of capital punishment. Unfortunately, the debate never addressed the acceptability of the death penalty itself, despite lengthy consideration by the legislature of a comprehensive package of criminal justice reforms during the same time.

This missed opportunity can be corrected. The legislature should consider abandoning the use of capital punishment in favor of life without parole.

While the death penalty might appeal to our emotional appetite for justice—or revenge—the reality is that it is not justly administered, the risk of executing an innocent is too high, and it does not serve victims very well.

Given the low value and high cost of the death penalty, capital punishment does not give taxpayers much bang for the buck. Instead it has become a bloated and bureaucratic policy that blindly seeks retribution despite a significant moral, social, and financial cost.

About the author

Libertas Institute Staff

Share Post:

Fighting for a Future Where Individuals Are Fully Liberated to Pursue Their Dreams, Free from Coercion and Control.

You Might Also Like

Policymakers can safeguard workers by investing in innovation—reskilling, flexible work models, and AI collaboration—to turn disruption into opportunity.
Local officials can provide relief to aspiring homeowners by passing an ordinance that legalizes attached and detached Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs).
Simpler, user-friendly zoning regulations can reduce uncertainty, giving residents more clarity and the ability to better participate in local land-use decisions

Help us Nail and Scale Policies to Reduce Government Control

Your tax-deductible contributions to Libertas Institute increase freedom across the country.