How Many People Can Live in a House?

This is an item in our Local Government Toolkit

You are not required to determine a specific number of occupants for residences in the city or county you represent. Nevertheless, some local governments have ordinances that limit occupancy—for all residences—to as low as three or four.

These laws not only remove the judgment of property owners, but they fail to account for variations in home size, bedroom numbers, and parking availability. They also actively hurt those you represent by making housing shortages worse.

Some cite various health and safety concerns as reasons for strict occupancy limits. However, most ordinances have exceptions to occupancy limits when the individuals are related to each other. This exception for families suggests that health and safety is not protected—or inherently violated—at occupancies of three, four, five, or six.

We recommend addressing concerns sometimes associated with occupancy, such as noise from late-night parties and neighborhood parking issues, with enforcement of existing laws related to those nuisances. For example, If ordinances to address neighborhood noise and parking do not exist (or are not being enforced), we recommend adopting and enforcing those laws, rather than attempting to resolve them by granting the government the ability to arbitrarily decide how many people can live in a residence.

Are you a local elected official and interested in chatting with us more about this topic? Please reach out to us at localgovt@libertas.institute—we’d love to chat!

About the author

Libertas Institute Staff

Share Post:

Fighting for a Future Where Individuals Are Fully Liberated to Pursue Their Dreams, Free from Coercion and Control.

You Might Also Like

Public disorder concerns are real, and residents deserve effective responses. But overcriminalization is at its most counterproductive reaches people not causing harm while leaving the underlying disorder untouched.
Utah's top 25% most-arrested homeless individuals cost Salt Lake City $51 million annually in shelter, police, court, and medical expenses. As lawmakers pour another $45.6 million into the system, organizations like The Other Side Village are already breaking the cycle through sobriety, accountability, and employment, without taxpayer funding. The data makes the case: expanding a broken system isn't the answer.
No, rent control doesn't work as supporters believe. Rather it treat symptoms while suppressing the signals that prompt more building, and lower costs.

Help us Nail and Scale Policies to Reduce Government Control

Your tax-deductible contributions to Libertas Institute increase freedom across the country.