RV, Camper, and Trailer Parking

This is an item in our Local Government Toolkit. 

Many residents you represent own products commonly called RVs, campers, and trailers. An issue that sometimes arises is how these are defined and where they are allowed to park. 

Prohibiting driveway parking for RVs and campers could prevent residents from owning and parking “adventure vans” in front driveways, which may be the only driveway space available to many property owners. Similarly, driveway restrictions would affect those who own “teardrop campers” or other recreational vehicles, often no larger than many full-size SUVs, and who rely on driveway parking for convenience and security. This restriction would also impact those using utility trailers for their livelihoods, as banning them from driveways could have serious consequences.

Some might welcome parking restrictions because they address aesthetic considerations. However, these considerations are most appropriately addressed via voluntary means, such as those found in HOA and similar agreements.

However, it is crucial to support regulations that prevent RVs, campers, and trailers from being parked in ways that obstruct the view of approaching vehicles at intersections, block street signage, or impede sidewalks. Such rules help ensure safety and accessibility and should be supported.

Are you a local elected official and interested in chatting with us more about this topic? Please reach out to us at localgovt@libertas.institute—we’d love to chat!

Author Profile Image
About the author

Lee Sands

Lee is the Local Government Policy Analyst at Libertas Institute, drawing on his research and entrepreneurial experience to inform and assist elected officials and the general public. He focuses on issues most relevant to local governments, such as land use, taxation, and business regulation. His work addresses the regulatory hurdles that matter most to families, small businesses, and entrepreneurs. A native of rural northeast Florida, Lee moved to Provo, Utah in 2004. Before joining Libertas, his path ran through the private sector in technical writing, journalism, and small business, giving him firsthand experience navigating the regulatory environment he now works to improve. He graduated from BYU and attended the Vermont College of Fine Arts. Outside of work, he enjoys time with his family, the outdoors, history, and creative pursuits.

Share Post:

Fighting for a Future Where Individuals Are Fully Liberated to Pursue Their Dreams, Free from Coercion and Control.

You Might Also Like

RAND Corporation review of the research found that people who took part in education programs in prison had 43% lower odds of recidivism than those who did not, and that the programs cost less than the reincarceration they prevent.
The scale of the program raises an important question: What does educational freedom look like when it is supported with public money?
That goal may sound reasonable on paper. In practice, CEQA has increasingly become a tool for obstructing housing development, exacerbating California’s housing shortage and keeping costs stubbornly high.

Help us Nail and Scale Policies to Reduce Government Control

Your tax-deductible contributions to Libertas Institute increase freedom across the country.