Funding All Parents’ Education Choices

Our compulsory public education system has never been neutral or tolerant. 

Blaine Amendments from the late 1800s were used by Protestants to keep Catholic schools from public money for education. Those same amendments have been used to limit parents to non-religious education choices. In 2003, a Pennsylvania school district suspended a teacher’s aide for wearing a cross while at work, limiting the employee’s right to religious expression. More recently, a football coach in Washington was fired because he prayed on the field after every game. 

But education wasn’t always this way. 

Most children began their learning at home during the colonial period of America. Mothers would take the responsibility to teach their children to read and write, while fathers would teach them marketable skills they would need. As the end of the 1700s approached, schools were established not by compulsion, but based upon market demand

Entrepreneurs in the years leading up to the American Revolution established all kinds of schools and education opportunities. They were trying to find their niche in the market. Religious schools were established for every sect in each community. Grammar schools that focused on Latin and Greek became popular. Quakers in Pennsylvania established schools for the poor, women and minorities. The market demand is what drove a school’s creation and maintained its viability.

But compulsory education laws have prevented this same level of diversity in modern day schooling.

Brown v. The Board of Education was the Supreme Court ruling eliminating state-sponsored segregation in schools. Previous to this, students who wanted a better education were prevented options because public schools were legally segregated by race. Yet compulsory education laws required that all students attend their assigned school.

Many schools look similar to what they were before the Brown ruling. Black students are more likely to attend schools with populations that are mostly black. In addition, those schools are still more likely to be in low income areas which also tend to have fewer resources. And students in those areas are still required to attend because of compulsory education laws.

Today, public schools continue to be battlegrounds for ideological debates. A Texas school doesn’t allow hoodies, skirts, or dresses. Many school districts in Utah limit religious regalia during graduation ceremonies. And many other ideological conflicts persist in schools today. These incidents emphasize the strife that comes with compulsory schools. 

These battles will continue because the state compels all children to attend school based upon their address.

But these issues can be solved.

If we look at national headlines about schools and ideological debates, places like Loudoun County, Virginia come to mind. Virginia is a place that has fewer educational options available to most of its families. Only 37% of students in Virginia are eligible for education choice measures, and the state offers very few charter schools. 

In contrast, we hear about relatively few school conflicts in states like Arizona. Arizona currently has five different education choice scholarships. Arizona just passed another measure expanding their education choice efforts making every student eligible for some type of scholarship.

States can follow Arizona’s lead and fund family choice in education. Measures like Utah’s Hope Scholarship could provide a pressure release valve for families frustrated with public schools. Parents would be free to choose something that they want for their children. Providing families with choice eliminates the strife we find in our public schools. 

About the author

Jon England

Jon is the Education Policy Analyst at Libertas Institute. He is a fourteen-year veteran of public schools. He taught both fifth and sixth grades, receiving Weber District’s E+ Team Award. He proudly homeschools his children with his wife. Jon received his bachelor’s degree in elementary education from the University of Utah and a master’s degree in educational leadership from Western Governors University. He spent time in the Marine Corps and separated as a sergeant in 2006. During his time in public schools, Jon increasingly understood the importance of parental empowerment in education. This increased understanding led him to join Libertas to provide educational freedom for families. Jon enjoys spending time with his wife and five children traveling, skiing, and playing games.

Share Post:

Fighting for a Future Where Individuals Are Fully Liberated to Pursue Their Dreams, Free from Coercion and Control.

You Might Also Like

The Utah Fits All Scholarship program is still alive. This legal fight is far from over. But for now, Utah families can move forward.
What if we’d regulated the internet before Google, Amazon, or email even existed—are we about to make the same mistake with AI?
This ruling may feel like a full stop, but it’s only a pause. The fight to give Utah parents and kids education choice is far from over.

Help us Nail and Scale Policies to Reduce Government Control

Your tax-deductible contributions to Libertas Institute increase freedom across the country.

Libertas Institute
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.