Model Policy: AI and Education

Objective:

The objective of this policy is to promote the responsible use of AI in K-12 classrooms. The policy aims to enhance students’ understanding of AI, encourage critical thinking, and ensure that AI is used as a tool for improvement rather than a substitute for their own work.

Restrictions: 

    1. Students are prohibited from relying solely on AI-generated information for their assignments. All assignments must be either a student’s own work or a combination of AI-generated content/support and the student’s own work. 
    2. Limitations should be imposed on teachers’ use of AI-detection software to prevent an overreliance on automated detection without considering the context or understanding the student’s learning process.

Supportive Measures:

No punitive measures will be taken against students who solely rely on AI. Instead, they will be given an opportunity to redo the assignment with guidance and support from the teacher or other qualified adults. When appropriate, students should be guided and taught how to use AI as a resource to create a new assignment, promoting active engagement and critical thinking.

Best Practices:

  1. Teachers should provide regular and individualized feedback to students on their assignments, highlighting areas for improvement and encouraging critical analysis of AI-generated content. 
  2. Assignments should include a requirement for students to disclose how, if at all, AI was used on any assignment, which will foster transparency and accountability in the learning process. 
  3. Ongoing support and professional development opportunities should be provided to teachers and students, including access to industry experts who can provide guidance on ethical AI use.

Encouraging Creativity and Experimentation:

The policy recognizes the importance of fostering a creative and experimental approach to using AI in assignments under the guidance of a teacher or other qualified individual. Students should be encouraged to explore different AI tools and techniques, while always considering the ethical implications, critical analysis, and seeking appropriate guidance.

Conclusion:

This policy seeks to integrate AI into assignments while upholding ethical standards and promoting critical thinking. By ensuring a balanced approach to AI usage and providing support and guidance to both students and teachers, we aim to empower students with the knowledge and skills necessary to leverage AI effectively while maintaining their own intellectual growth and development.

Please note that this is a draft policy, and it may require further review and adjustments to align with the specific requirements and guidelines of your school.

Author Profile Image
About the author

Jon England

Jon is the former Senior Education Policy Analyst at Libertas Institute.

Share Post:

Fighting for a Future Where Individuals Are Fully Liberated to Pursue Their Dreams, Free from Coercion and Control.

You Might Also Like

We allow people to eat sugary foods despite the adverse health effects. The same respect for individual choice should extend to other risky behaviors.
A family pulled their daughter from a school that shut them out. When an Arkansas amendment threatened that choice, parents kept it off the ballot.
Kids can handle more than we plan for. They can figure out what their supplies cost, talk to strangers, shake off a slow day, and work out what to try next. What most of them are missing is a first yes: someone who puts the idea in front of them and then gets out of the way.

Help us Nail and Scale Policies to Reduce Government Control

Your tax-deductible contributions to Libertas Institute increase freedom across the country.