A Bidding War for Bread? A Metaphor for Utah’s Housing Crisis

Imagine if you went to a grocery store where the price of the bread on the shelf was subject to a bidding war. There’s one loaf on the shelf, and there are ten other interested shoppers. It’s wheat bread with nuts sprinkled on top — not exactly everyone’s top choice — but the pantry is empty, and the kids are hungry.

“Four dollars!” a lady from the middle of the group shouts. “Five!” a young man counters. Bids of six, seven, and eight quickly follow. The bid hits ten dollars before things slow down. A man from California breaks the silence. 

“Fifteen dollars for the bread,” he states. Obviously having won the bidding war, he pushes his cart to the shelf, places the loaf on top of his eggs, and wheels away.

The other shoppers are frustrated. A loaf of bread is not worth fifteen dollars, they insist. Searching for solutions, some of the shoppers propose, “Force the store to sell bread for two dollars,” “Close the doors to Californians,” and “Double everyone’s income so we can afford bread.”

None of these proposals would solve the underlying problem, which is that the grocery store has a bread shortage. In this example, the overpriced bread problem isn’t solved by declaring a bread crisis and debating about growth. The solution is obvious — the store should bake more bread. 

While the metaphor isn’t perfect for Utah’s housing crisis, it works to demonstrate how our real estate market is currently functioning. Due to insufficient levels of construction for over a decade (which as of 2023 stands at a 31,000 home deficit), the same house worth $250,000 in 2015 now sells for $500,000 or more.

This level of housing price inflation means that police officers, teachers, and other professionals making less than about $80,000 cannot qualify for a home loan. 

Alarmingly, the shortage of homes that those with middle-class incomes can afford isn’t because no one is willing or able to build them. It’s because local zoning regulations often make products like starter homes on small lots and duplexes illegal to build. The mandates to only build larger homes on large lots has the same effect of placing too few loaves of bread on the shelf for sale.

In short, the solution to shortages is removing barriers to supply. After all, without widespread abundance of life’s necessities, economic security for self and society is not possible.

Author Profile Image
About the author

Lee Sands

Lee is the Local Government Policy Analyst at Libertas Institute. He has had a lifelong passion for research, writing, entrepreneurship, local government, and building relationships with people from all walks of life. Before joining Libertas, Lee worked as a technical writer, covered tech and local events as a journalist, developed websites, launched a Kickstarter campaign, and helped businesses create budgets and integrate accounting and other systems. A native of rural northeast Florida, Lee moved to Provo, Utah in 2004. Since graduating from BYU and attending the Vermont College of Fine Arts, Lee has started a family, become increasingly active in local politics as a volunteer, and now joins Libertas to be a resource for elected officials and the general public. Lee enjoys camping, fishing, Jeeping, history, and all things creative and analytical.

Share Post:

Fighting for a Future Where Individuals Are Fully Liberated to Pursue Their Dreams, Free from Coercion and Control.

You Might Also Like

Nevada has made a bold bet on innovation—creating a new sandbox where property insurance startups can test solutions to wildfire risk and rising premiums.
Is Congress really blocking states from passing AI laws—or is there more to the “AI Moratorium” than headlines suggest?
Why are Utah families paying $1,000 more each month just to buy a new home—and what outdated policy is to blame?

Help us Nail and Scale Policies to Reduce Government Control

Your tax-deductible contributions to Libertas Institute increase freedom across the country.