Did Missouri Really Just Vote to Save Its Income Tax?

In The News

Last week, Missouri voters overwhelmingly rejected a proposal to eliminate their state income tax. The vote was 83.32% to 16.68%.

So what should Utah and other states looking to reduce or eliminate income taxes learn from Missouri?

Here’s My Take

The lesson from Missouri isn’t that states should stop cutting income taxes. It’s that voters want a clear roadmap for phasing them out, and clarity about the transition would look like.

A closer look at Amendment 5 shows why. The proposal would have required Missouri to phase out its individual income tax, but it also would have weakened a constitutional restriction on taxing services that voters approved in 2016.

In other words, a somewhat nebulous plan to phase out the income tax that involves extending sales taxes to previously untaxed services is a tough sell.

Missouri’s rejection of an income-tax phaseout is also something of a trend breaker. North Carolina enacted a full phaseout of its corporate income tax in 2021, reaching zero by 2030. Kentucky followed in 2022 with a plan to phase out its individual income tax, with Mississippi, Oklahoma, and South Carolina adopting similar plans since.

In Closing

There’s nothing in the water in Missouri that makes its voters uniquely fond of income taxes. More likely, the proposition itself was unclear and short on detail.

States working to reduce or ultimately phase out their income taxes shouldn’t read Missouri as a reason to reverse course. Utah has steadily lowered its income tax rate in recent years, and Missouri’s vote shouldn’t change that trajectory.

Author Profile Image
About the author

Lee Sands

Lee is the Local Government Policy Analyst at Libertas Institute, drawing on his research and entrepreneurial experience to inform and assist elected officials and the general public. He focuses on issues most relevant to local governments, such as land use, taxation, and business regulation. His work addresses the regulatory hurdles that matter most to families, small businesses, and entrepreneurs. A native of rural northeast Florida, Lee moved to Provo, Utah in 2004. Before joining Libertas, his path ran through the private sector in technical writing, journalism, and small business, giving him firsthand experience navigating the regulatory environment he now works to improve. He graduated from BYU and attended the Vermont College of Fine Arts. Outside of work, he enjoys time with his family, the outdoors, history, and creative pursuits.

Share Post:

Fighting for a Future Where Individuals Are Fully Liberated to Pursue Their Dreams, Free from Coercion and Control.

You Might Also Like

AI, and superintelligence more specifically, has the potential to be radically equitable in its consequences. That is the larger point of a memo from Mark Zuckerberg.
250 years ago colonists fought blank-check searches. Today it's license plate readers and data brokers. The Fourth Amendment fight isn't over.
Doomsday AI job predictions keep missing while unemployment holds steady. Why Utah lawmakers should champion innovation over speculative fear.

Help us Nail and Scale Policies to Reduce Government Control

Your tax-deductible contributions to Libertas Institute increase freedom across the country.