Utah’s housing crisis is only getting worse, and NIMBYism (“Not In My Backyard”) is a recurring obstruction to meaningful solutions. NIMBYism, in this case, refers to pushback against building high-density housing and diverse home types in Utah — from duplexes to accessory dwelling units (ADUs).
NIMBYism only serves to deepen the crisis.
The status quo, where single-family homes dominate and “density” is treated like a dirty word, is unsustainable.
(AP Photo/Rick Bowmer, File)
More than 80% of Utah households feel that home prices and rents are too high, with median home prices hovering near $550,000. Much of this is caused by holding on to outdated and unnecessary regulations that restrict creative design solutions.
Concerns about growth and increased density, like the idea that it decreases property values, are largely unfounded. In fact, studies show that well-designed dense housing can increase property values, improve walkability, and strengthen the sense of community.
Diversifying Housing for Future Generations
If we want to ensure future generations can live close to family and maintain the strong social ties Utah is known for, we must embrace a wider variety of housing types. Smaller lot homes, ADUs, apartments, and mixed-use developments can provide much-needed affordability while preserving the unique character of our neighborhoods.
When NIMBY concerns delay or block development, it is imperative that local governments, planners, and residents address them. If we don’t, the housing shortage will only get worse. We need to build for the future—not just for ourselves and the people who are moving here, but for our own children.
When my children grow up and start looking for a place to live, I would like them to have opportunities in Utah. Without these changes, young families will be forced to leave the Beehive State in search of more affordable options elsewhere.
Let’s work together to expand our housing options and ensure a future where Utahns can stay close to home.
Director of Communications