Let’s Rethink Chicken Ownership in Cities

This op-ed originally appeared in City Weekly on September 11, 2024.

Imagine your city—like Washington Terrace in Weber County—is about to decide whether to allow residents to keep backyard chickens. While it might seem like a niche issue, it reflects broader trends in how cities are rethinking property owners’ freedoms.

From a liberty standpoint, owning chickens is not much different from owning cats or dogs. Animal ownership comes with responsibilities such as feeding, sheltering and maintaining sanitary conditions. Although caring for chickens may be new to some, it’s well within the average person’s ability to manage.

Concerns about noise and odors often surface in debates over animal ownership. However, when properly cared for, the noise and odors from chickens are minimal and hardly noticeable, even in close quarters.

City regulations on backyard chickens should be straightforward, focusing on key issues like noise, odor and sanitation. Farmington, for example, offers a great example of how to regulate backyard chickens effectively. They avoid unnecessary rules, such as requiring permits and fees, imposing overly strict limits on the number of chickens, or banning them on smaller lots. This approach balances the needs of residents while keeping the regulations simple and fair.

About the author

Lee Sands

Lee is the Local Government Policy Analyst at Libertas Institute. He has had a lifelong passion for research, writing, entrepreneurship, local government, and building relationships with people from all walks of life. Before joining Libertas, Lee worked as a technical writer, covered tech and local events as a journalist, developed websites, launched a Kickstarter campaign, and helped businesses create budgets and integrate accounting and other systems. A native of rural northeast Florida, Lee moved to Provo, Utah in 2004. Since graduating from BYU and attending the Vermont College of Fine Arts, Lee has started a family, become increasingly active in local politics as a volunteer, and now joins Libertas to be a resource for elected officials and the general public. Lee enjoys camping, fishing, Jeeping, history, and all things creative and analytical.

Share Post:

Fighting for a Future Where Individuals Are Fully Liberated to Pursue Their Dreams, Free from Coercion and Control.

You Might Also Like

The Utah Fits All Scholarship program is still alive. This legal fight is far from over. But for now, Utah families can move forward.
What if we’d regulated the internet before Google, Amazon, or email even existed—are we about to make the same mistake with AI?
This ruling may feel like a full stop, but it’s only a pause. The fight to give Utah parents and kids education choice is far from over.

Help us Nail and Scale Policies to Reduce Government Control

Your tax-deductible contributions to Libertas Institute increase freedom across the country.

Libertas Institute
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.