Why Do We Care About Common Core?

The following is a transcript of the remarks shared by Connor Boyack at this week’s anti-Common Core rally at the Utah Capitol.

We care because we support parental stewardship in education — the ultimate local control.

Michael Novak, a prolific cultural commentator, once wrote: “Between the omnipotent state and the naked individual looms the first line of resistance against totalitarianism: the economically and politically independent family, protecting the space within which free and independent individuals may receive the necessary years of nurture.”

Our organization fights for life, liberty, and property in Utah. Because we are concerned about liberty, we are concerned about preserving the ability for families to raise free and independent individuals. Education, of course, is central to this process. Dictators throughout history have recognized this and used compulsory education to propagandize the rising generation. One of the more popular of these dictators once said, “He… who owns the youth, gains the future.”

I don’t want the government to regulate or indoctrinate my children, let alone own them—they are mine. God gave them to me.

So what does Common Core have to do with any of this? This latest educational initiative is a power play—a strategic advance by the “omnipotent state” to gain ground and diminish the influence of that “first line of resistance,” the family. Common Core centralizes education policy within small spheres of influence. It homogenizes our children, suppressing individuality. It reduces the input and involvement of the family.

At its core, then, Common Core is anti-family. And while we would argue that an “economically and politically independent family” should shoulder the burden of educating their children outside of a government system, we believe that while such a system exists, its power should be devolved to local levels to maximize freedom and diversity. In short, Utah should reject Common Core.

About the author

Libertas Institute Staff

Share Post:

Fighting for a Future Where Individuals Are Fully Liberated to Pursue Their Dreams, Free from Coercion and Control.

You Might Also Like

Public disorder concerns are real, and residents deserve effective responses. But overcriminalization is at its most counterproductive reaches people not causing harm while leaving the underlying disorder untouched.
Utah's top 25% most-arrested homeless individuals cost Salt Lake City $51 million annually in shelter, police, court, and medical expenses. As lawmakers pour another $45.6 million into the system, organizations like The Other Side Village are already breaking the cycle through sobriety, accountability, and employment, without taxpayer funding. The data makes the case: expanding a broken system isn't the answer.
No, rent control doesn't work as supporters believe. Rather it treat symptoms while suppressing the signals that prompt more building, and lower costs.

Help us Nail and Scale Policies to Reduce Government Control

Your tax-deductible contributions to Libertas Institute increase freedom across the country.