The $51 Million Revolving Door Has a Private Sector Exit

In the News

New state homeless coordinator Tyler Clancy’s office released data this week, covered by the Deseret News, revealing how deeply Utah’s chronic homelessness and criminal recidivism problems overlap, and how expensive that overlap has become. In Salt Lake City alone, 77% of individuals arrested four or more times last year were homeless. The top 25% of those most-arrested individuals—averaging 11 arrests and 7.5 years on the street—account for $51 million annually in shelter, police, court, and medical costs. Even prior to this data being highlighted, Utah lawmakers had already approved $45.6 million this year to expand the state’s homeless services system. 

Here’s Our Take

This data puts a price tag on something we’ve long understood. Chronic homelessness is a crisis of addiction, mental illness, and broken community. Cycling people through shelters, courts, and emergency rooms doesn’t fix any of those. The Other Side Village, a peer-led therapeutic community grown from The Other Side Academy, takes a different approach: sobriety requirements, personal accountability, and employment through self-sustaining enterprises.

Since The Other Side moved into downtown Salt Lake City in 2015, neighbors reported their neighborhood improved and police reported crime went down. Participants have broken out of the cycle, showing lower recidivism and avoiding future homelessness. That track record came from building stronger culture and demanding real accountability, all without government programs or taxpayer money.

Closing

The $51 million figure reflects just one piece of the crisis. Lawmakers have already thrown $45.6 million more at the problem. Clancy is asking the right questions about how to spend it. His focus on root causes is exactly where reform needs to go. But the broader lesson is that private organizations like The Other Side are already addressing those causes without the burden on taxpayers. If Utah wants results, it needs to either learn from what’s actually working, or start opening more doors for private solutions, not just expanding the system the data just indicted.

Author Profile Image
About the author

Josh Nemeth

Josh Nemeth is the Criminal Justice Policy Analyst at Libertas Institute. Before joining Libertas, he spent a decade in criminal prosecution between Utah and Montana, most recently as a Special Victims Unit prosecutor for Cache County. He also works as a criminal defense attorney, giving him experience on both sides of Utah’s criminal justice system. That background informs his commitment to criminal justice reform grounded in limited government and individual liberty, with practical solutions that protect public safety. Josh holds a J.D. from BYU’s J. Reuben Clark Law School and degrees in business. A father of four, he lives in rural Cache County with his wife and children.

Share Post:

Fighting for a Future Where Individuals Are Fully Liberated to Pursue Their Dreams, Free from Coercion and Control.

You Might Also Like

No, rent control doesn't work as supporters believe. Rather it treat symptoms while suppressing the signals that prompt more building, and lower costs.
A Twitch streamer made the moral case for stealing from corporations on the New York Times' podcast. As a former prosecutor, here's why that argument gets justice exactly backwards, and why the real victims are never corporations.
A Washington County detective fired for misusing Utah’s criminal justice database for personal reasons. How can we better protect the privacy of our citizens?

Help us Nail and Scale Policies to Reduce Government Control

Your tax-deductible contributions to Libertas Institute increase freedom across the country.