Ed Tech is A Symptom, Not the Disease

In the News

In The Atlantic, Will Oremus argues that gamified education tools like Prodigy, Blooket, Gimkit, and Kahoot have become a distraction in American classrooms. His concern is valid as many ed tech tools are terrible education wrapped in a subpar game. They do little to help students master material or close learning gaps.

Here’s My Take

The real problem is structural. Schools have needed to adapt for a long time, and technology became the shortcut to attempt individualization without changing the structure of school.

The push for 1-to-1 devices, learning apps, and gamified platforms proves that the traditional classroom struggles to meet students at different levels. Teachers are reaching for personalized software to give students better pacing, feedback, and support, but the conventional school model was not built to meet each student at their level.

Some learning apps are excellent, but schools need better discernment and teacher training to use them well.

Microschools are already doing this better. Some report more than twice the academic growth of similar students.

Closing

Public schools need to adapt. In the meantime, policymakers should expand school choice so families can find learning environments that fit their children.

Author Profile Image
About the author

Jon England

Jon is the Senior Education Policy Analyst at Libertas Institute. He is a fourteen-year veteran of public schools. He taught both fifth and sixth grades, receiving Weber District’s E+ Team Award. He proudly homeschools his children with his wife. Jon received his bachelor’s degree in elementary education from the University of Utah and a master’s degree in educational leadership from Western Governors University. He spent time in the Marine Corps and separated as a sergeant in 2006. During his time in public schools, Jon increasingly understood the importance of parental empowerment in education. This increased understanding led him to join Libertas to provide educational freedom for families. Jon enjoys spending time with his wife and five children traveling, skiing, and playing games.

Share Post:

Fighting for a Future Where Individuals Are Fully Liberated to Pursue Their Dreams, Free from Coercion and Control.

You Might Also Like

Free societies build better institutions, and better institutions build better talent.
Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act was enacted in 2008 to authorize government collection of communications from non-U.S. persons located abroad.
Transparency is the foundation on which public trust is built on, and a watchful citizenry is how liberty continues to stand.

Help us Nail and Scale Policies to Reduce Government Control

Your tax-deductible contributions to Libertas Institute increase freedom across the country.