Free Countries are More Likely to Participate in the World Cup. That’s Not a Coincidence.

The 2026 FIFA World Cup arrives in North America this summer, with 48 nations competing from Los Angeles to New York. For most fans, it’s about wins and losses, but there’s something else worth considering.

The Cato Institute’s 2025 Human Freedom Index (HFI) ranks 165 countries across 87 measures of personal, civil, and economic liberty. This includes rule of law, freedom of expression, property rights, freedom of movement, the right to form associations, build businesses, practice religion, and speak without fear. When mapped against World Cup qualification, a clear pattern emerges: freer nations are more likely to compete. The average HFI score of World Cup participants is more than 17 points higher than non-participants.

The HFI isn’t measuring happiness or prosperity. It measures the absence of regulatory constraints and flawed governmental institutions, how much a government leaves its people alone to live, work, associate, and think. Strong property rights and reliable legal systems give investors the confidence to commit capital to professional sports. In low-freedom countries, those protections break down, and investment follows.

The freest countries also tend to be the wealthiest. Top-quartile freedom nations average a per capita income of $53,635; the bottom quartile averages $14,201. That gap funds the infrastructure to develop world-class players. Free societies build better institutions, and better institutions build better talent.

What to Watch For

The nations competing this summer are not the result of random chance. The World Cup reflects economic and political reality — the countries that build, invest, and create conditions for human talent to thrive are the ones that show up. The 2025 Human Freedom Index tells you which countries those are, and many of them will be on display this summer.

Author Profile Image
About the author

Kristian Fors

Kristian Fors is the Technology and Innovation Policy Analyst at Libertas Institute. He previously worked as a research fellow for the Independent Institute, where his research focused on California public policy. Prior to that, he also worked as an intern for the United Nations Development Program in Denmark and as an English teacher at private schools in Russia. He received his bachelor’s degree from Utah State University and holds master’s degrees from the Moscow State Institute of International Relations (MGIMO) and the London School of Economics. Kristian is originally from California, but his family’s history traces back to the founding of Utah—a legacy that inspires his commitment to policies that help the state remain competitive and continue to thrive. Outside of his policy work, Kristian is interested in financial markets, traveling, and exploring other cultures. He is fluent in both Swedish and Russian.

Share Post:

Fighting for a Future Where Individuals Are Fully Liberated to Pursue Their Dreams, Free from Coercion and Control.

You Might Also Like

Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act was enacted in 2008 to authorize government collection of communications from non-U.S. persons located abroad.
Transparency is the foundation on which public trust is built on, and a watchful citizenry is how liberty continues to stand.
Many voters support teachers’ unions without understanding how this support translates into political actions and priorities.

Help us Nail and Scale Policies to Reduce Government Control

Your tax-deductible contributions to Libertas Institute increase freedom across the country.