Bluffdale Allows for Detached ADUs. Should Your City?

Bluffdale’s decision to permit detached Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) marks a victory for property rights and housing freedom. By allowing homeowners the flexibility to construct backyard cottages on their properties, Bluffdale is championing individual liberty while addressing pressing housing needs. To its credit, Bluffdale is going a step further than merely allowing detached ADUs — they recently announced the production of a toolkit designed to help residents build them.

Detached ADU legalization, different from the basement apartment ADUs already legal across the state, empower property owners to construct dwellings completely separate from their primary home. The following are just a few ways detached ADUs can benefit homeowners and communities:

  • Enable older or disabled residents to live on the same lot as their relatives, creating a means for their needs to be met and for them to remain in the community.
  • Increase the supply of affordable housing not requiring government subsidies.
  • Enable a young couple to save up money to buy their own home.
  • Increase the tax base while minimizing the costs related to new public infrastructure.
  • Have the benefits of an ADU, with the increased privacy of not having to share walls.

These benefits, available to Bluffdale residents, promote a fundamental aspect of personal freedom — the right to use your land as you see fit.

Perceived downsides to detached ADU legalization, such as parking issues, noise, and other potential nuisances can all be handled by a well-crafted ordinance and addressed in a well-written toolkit.

With its support of detached ADUs, Bluffdale sets an example for municipalities across the state. As other cities consider similar measures, they too may embrace the principles of property rights and housing freedom, granting their residents more freedom to use their property.

Author Profile Image
About the author

Lee Sands

Lee is the Local Government Policy Analyst at Libertas Institute, drawing on his research and entrepreneurial experience to inform and assist elected officials and the general public. He focuses on issues most relevant to local governments, such as land use, taxation, and business regulation. His work addresses the regulatory hurdles that matter most to families, small businesses, and entrepreneurs. A native of rural northeast Florida, Lee moved to Provo, Utah in 2004. Before joining Libertas, his path ran through the private sector in technical writing, journalism, and small business, giving him firsthand experience navigating the regulatory environment he now works to improve. He graduated from BYU and attended the Vermont College of Fine Arts. Outside of work, he enjoys time with his family, the outdoors, history, and creative pursuits.

Share Post:

Fighting for a Future Where Individuals Are Fully Liberated to Pursue Their Dreams, Free from Coercion and Control.

You Might Also Like

Utah's top 25% most-arrested homeless individuals cost Salt Lake City $51 million annually in shelter, police, court, and medical expenses. As lawmakers pour another $45.6 million into the system, organizations like The Other Side Village are already breaking the cycle through sobriety, accountability, and employment, without taxpayer funding. The data makes the case: expanding a broken system isn't the answer.
No, rent control doesn't work as supporters believe. Rather it treat symptoms while suppressing the signals that prompt more building, and lower costs.
A Twitch streamer made the moral case for stealing from corporations on the New York Times' podcast. As a former prosecutor, here's why that argument gets justice exactly backwards, and why the real victims are never corporations.

Help us Nail and Scale Policies to Reduce Government Control

Your tax-deductible contributions to Libertas Institute increase freedom across the country.