Los Angeles rents are falling. Here’s why.

In July, it was reported that rents in Los Angeles County had fallen to a four-year low. While rents remained high compared to much of the nation, with a reported median price of $2,603 per month, the decline offers a glimpse of what can happen when governments liberalize housing restrictions and allow developers to build.

California’s housing crisis is largely self-inflicted, caused by decades of zoning restrictions and other regulations that have prevented developers from producing enough housing to meet market demand. Laws like the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) are often weaponized to delay or block new development, imposing significant costs and delays on infill housing projects across the Golden State.

While California still has a long way to go in terms of regulatory reform, recent declines in rental prices can be attributed, at least in part, to long-overdue policy changes. It was reported that the falling rents reflect “additional housing options provided by new multifamily development and accessory dwelling unit (ADU) construction,” in addition to post-COVID-19 market stabilization.

ADUs are secondary housing units located on residential properties, such as garages converted into living spaces or small detached homes. For decades, California heavily regulated ADU construction, restricting property owners’ ability to use their land productively and limiting the housing supply.

In recent years, however, the state has enacted reforms to make ADUs easier and less costly to build, allowing property owners to bring much-needed housing to the market. In fact, as of 2024, ADUs accounted for over 26 percent of all homes permitted statewide. In Los Angeles County, the housing type amounted for 37 percent of all new housing units certified for occupancy in 2025. All in all, the total number of ADUs permitted in California increased by 15,334 percent between 2016 and 2022.

Despite these improvements, housing prices in California remain exorbitantly high…

Read the rest of the article at Los Angeles Daily News 

Author Profile Image
About the author

Kristian Fors

Kristian Fors is the Technology and Innovation Policy Analyst at Libertas Institute. He previously worked as a research fellow for the Independent Institute, where his research focused on California public policy. Prior to that, he also worked as an intern for the United Nations Development Program in Denmark and as an English teacher at private schools in Russia. He received his bachelor’s degree from Utah State University and holds master’s degrees from the Moscow State Institute of International Relations (MGIMO) and the London School of Economics. Kristian is originally from California, but his family’s history traces back to the founding of Utah—a legacy that inspires his commitment to policies that help the state remain competitive and continue to thrive. Outside of his policy work, Kristian is interested in financial markets, traveling, and exploring other cultures. He is fluent in both Swedish and Russian.

Share Post:

Fighting for a Future Where Individuals Are Fully Liberated to Pursue Their Dreams, Free from Coercion and Control.

You Might Also Like

California’s wealth tax push, its CEQA lawsuits, and Prop 13 offer Utah a clear warning about which policy ideas to keep out of the Beehive State.
Utah’s aggressive lawsuit against Kalshi treats prediction markets like traditional casinos—setting a dangerous precedent for government overreach and digital freedom.
A consistent federal framework could make it significantly easier for technology companies to scale their products and operate efficiently across the country.

Help us Nail and Scale Policies to Reduce Government Control

Your tax-deductible contributions to Libertas Institute increase freedom across the country.