Mamdani’s ‘Delivery Protection Act’ won’t save NYC workers — it will replace them

 

Last month, New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani backed the “Delivery Protection Act,” which would require companies such as Amazon to directly employ workers who do deliveries for them through outside companies that hire gig workers. It would also subject local fulfillment facilities, such as Amazon warehouses, to a new licensing regime, meaning that they could operate only if they comply with certain employment standards, among other things. While this may sound beneficial to workers on paper, the truth is that the bill would deprive self-employed individuals of opportunities and violate the spirit of entrepreneurship.

In a free market, transactions are voluntary and based on mutual benefit. The only reason someone would choose to work as an independent contractor or for a third-party provider is that they deem it beneficial. Many workers actually prefer to be self-employed, whether it be for greater flexibility, more time with family, or potentially better pay. When governments force specific terms of employment on businesses, they prevent individuals and businesses from negotiating the terms that best suit their circumstances. 

Read the rest of the article here in the Washington Examiner.

Author Profile Image
About the author

Kristian Fors

Kristian Fors is the Technology and Innovation Policy Analyst at Libertas Institute. He previously worked as a research fellow for the Independent Institute, where his research focused on California public policy. Prior to that, he also worked as an intern for the United Nations Development Program in Denmark and as an English teacher at private schools in Russia. He received his bachelor’s degree from Utah State University and holds master’s degrees from the Moscow State Institute of International Relations (MGIMO) and the London School of Economics. Kristian is originally from California, but his family’s history traces back to the founding of Utah—a legacy that inspires his commitment to policies that help the state remain competitive and continue to thrive. Outside of his policy work, Kristian is interested in financial markets, traveling, and exploring other cultures. He is fluent in both Swedish and Russian.

Share Post:

Fighting for a Future Where Individuals Are Fully Liberated to Pursue Their Dreams, Free from Coercion and Control.

You Might Also Like

Utah’s aggressive lawsuit against Kalshi treats prediction markets like traditional casinos—setting a dangerous precedent for government overreach and digital freedom.
A consistent federal framework could make it significantly easier for technology companies to scale their products and operate efficiently across the country.
More than 90% of Utah civil forfeitures involve cash, with half under $2,020—mostly starting at simple traffic stops without requiring a criminal conviction. Utah gets a 'C' for police overreach, but tackling civil forfeiture is the single fastest way to raise the grade.

Help us Nail and Scale Policies to Reduce Government Control

Your tax-deductible contributions to Libertas Institute increase freedom across the country.