Empowering Gig Workers with Portable Benefits

The “gig economy” is on the rise, as people pursue flexible employment options that allow them to be their own boss. But there’s a downside to this approach: the lack of benefits.

To remedy this issue, we developed legislation to offer a pathway for independent contractors and gig workers to access affordable coverage options by clarifying that voluntary contributions from hiring parties will not create an employment relationship.

Portable benefits plans act like an insurance product where gig workers pay premiums in exchange for coverage. These plans often offer health insurance, but they could also include disability insurance, income replacement, dental insurance, automotive insurance, and more.

Even more relevant than the type of insurance they provide, however, is the way they are set up to benefit workers. Instead of spreading out risk by pooling workers with others within a company, these plans simply spread out risk by grouping independent contractors and gig workers together. What this means, practically, is that coverage isn’t tied to a worker’s employer in the traditional way coverage is offered today.

Our proposal expanded on this concept, allowing gig economy platforms and other hiring parties to offer full or matching contributions to portable benefit plans, significantly lowering the cost of coverage for workers.

While state solutions like this are only one of several necessary reforms to improve the lives of independent contractors and gig workers, this bill put Utah on the cutting edge of labor law. Our model is now an example of the right path forward for other states and the federal government as we embrace a future of work that is flexible and worker-centric.

Fighting for a Future Where Individuals Are Fully Liberated to Pursue Their Dreams, Free from Coercion and Control.

You Might Also Like

Utah's top 25% most-arrested homeless individuals cost Salt Lake City $51 million annually in shelter, police, court, and medical expenses. As lawmakers pour another $45.6 million into the system, organizations like The Other Side Village are already breaking the cycle through sobriety, accountability, and employment, without taxpayer funding. The data makes the case: expanding a broken system isn't the answer.
No, rent control doesn't work as supporters believe. Rather it treat symptoms while suppressing the signals that prompt more building, and lower costs.
A Twitch streamer made the moral case for stealing from corporations on the New York Times' podcast. As a former prosecutor, here's why that argument gets justice exactly backwards, and why the real victims are never corporations.

Help us Nail and Scale Policies to Reduce Government Control

Your tax-deductible contributions to Libertas Institute increase freedom across the country.