How Should Local Government Deal With Food Trucks?

This is an item in our Local Government Toolkit

Food trucks—an increasingly popular type of mobile food vendor—benefit the community you represent in a number of ways:

  1. Provide a variety of food options in more locations to residents
  2. Enable operators to make a living for themselves and those they employ
  3. Provide revenue for the state, counties, and cities where they operate

As food trucks proliferated in Utah, some local governments went too far in their restrictions or otherwise struggled to amend or adopt ordinances that properly accounted for their business model. This triggered a series of state laws that encouraged and required the reduced regulation of these companies.

To allow for these beneficial businesses to feel comfortable operating in the city or county you represent, you should consider amending or enacting a mobile food truck ordinance that is welcoming and in compliance with state law. We discourage regulations that are not related to the health and safety of residents—such as food truck restriction areas and mandates to change locations frequently—that only benefit nearby businesses they might compete with. Furthermore, food trucks should be classified and regulated (in many ways) like other mobile businesses with much less restrictions, such as caterers and contractors.

It is important to note that food trucks must comply with all laws related to food service, including having their vehicles inspected by the fire and county health departments.

Are you a local elected official and interested in chatting with us more about this topic? Please reach out to us at localgovt@libertas.institute—we’d love to chat!

Resources:

Relevant Libertas Work:

About the author

Libertas Institute Staff

Share Post:

Fighting for a Future Where Individuals Are Fully Liberated to Pursue Their Dreams, Free from Coercion and Control.

You Might Also Like

Utah's top 25% most-arrested homeless individuals cost Salt Lake City $51 million annually in shelter, police, court, and medical expenses. As lawmakers pour another $45.6 million into the system, organizations like The Other Side Village are already breaking the cycle through sobriety, accountability, and employment, without taxpayer funding. The data makes the case: expanding a broken system isn't the answer.
No, rent control doesn't work as supporters believe. Rather it treat symptoms while suppressing the signals that prompt more building, and lower costs.
A Twitch streamer made the moral case for stealing from corporations on the New York Times' podcast. As a former prosecutor, here's why that argument gets justice exactly backwards, and why the real victims are never corporations.

Help us Nail and Scale Policies to Reduce Government Control

Your tax-deductible contributions to Libertas Institute increase freedom across the country.