School Funding Should Focus On Learning, Not Attendance

Schools in Utah are facing a problem. Students don’t want to return after the COVID years.

This is important to schools because the vast majority of public and charter schools receive funding based upon the number of students who show up each day.

So, what if we funded schools differently?

Currently, the State Board of Education allows for two different funding models for school. The traditional seat time model and the learner-validated attendance model.

Learner-validated attendance allows the schools to individualize the education of the children. This model provides flexibility to the family and student to complete assignments on their own time. Regular communication and understanding of the topic are key points in this model.

Learner-validated attendance uses things like online learning, in-person learning, or blended learning, which is a combination of the two. 

Schools that are using this model effectively do not worry about attendance. Their funding isn’t based upon a child coming to school, but instead on the child progressing and regular communication.

Canyon Grove Academy in Pleasant Grove uses this model. This charter school has students who physically attend the school anywhere from two to five days a week. The school has put together learning modules that parents can easily grab and use at home.

The school then focuses on experiential learning while the students are there. The school is surrounded by garden spaces. They have an on-campus farm with a variety of animals. There is a space center where students learn teamwork and problem solving as they work through space missions together.  

This model of schooling puts parents in control of their child’s learning. The school is there to support the parents and be a resource for them.

By the way, Canyon Grove Academy doesn’t struggle with absenteeism.

Families learned that school can be adapted to their needs during the pandemic. So, schools could try to return to their normal operations, provide learning the same way they have always done, and hope students return. But the same old model of school will keep getting the same results. Or we can move to a model that doesn’t focus on seat time, but individualized education.

About the author

Jon England

Jon is the Education Policy Analyst at Libertas Institute. He is a fourteen-year veteran of public schools. He taught both fifth and sixth grades, receiving Weber District’s E+ Team Award. He proudly homeschools his children with his wife. Jon received his bachelor’s degree in elementary education from the University of Utah and a master’s degree in educational leadership from Western Governors University. He spent time in the Marine Corps and separated as a sergeant in 2006. During his time in public schools, Jon increasingly understood the importance of parental empowerment in education. This increased understanding led him to join Libertas to provide educational freedom for families. Jon enjoys spending time with his wife and five children traveling, skiing, and playing games.

Share Post:

Fighting for a Future Where Individuals Are Fully Liberated to Pursue Their Dreams, Free from Coercion and Control.

You Might Also Like

The Utah Fits All Scholarship program is still alive. This legal fight is far from over. But for now, Utah families can move forward.
What if we’d regulated the internet before Google, Amazon, or email even existed—are we about to make the same mistake with AI?
This ruling may feel like a full stop, but it’s only a pause. The fight to give Utah parents and kids education choice is far from over.

Help us Nail and Scale Policies to Reduce Government Control

Your tax-deductible contributions to Libertas Institute increase freedom across the country.