The Surveillance Generation

This op-ed originally appeared in DC Journal on November 10, 2023.

In class, students might learn they have a right to privacy (the Fourth Amendment), but their experience appears to be moving in the opposite direction.

Every day, thousands of students have their privacy violated by attending school. Students walk through AI scanners that evaluate their backpacks, coats and lunch boxes for weapons. Facial recognition software scans their faces and records their biometric information. Their personal files, kept on their school-issued account, are scanned for “concerning” material.

Taking an ends-justify-the-means approach to privacy might provide a false sense of security for some parents and administrators. Still, it comes at the expense of the very kids they aim to protect. Surveys and focus groups reveal that education surveillance has caused students to not only alter their behavior and speech but also lead to early negative interactions with law enforcement from a young age.

What will privacy mean to a generation that was raised in this environment? What would privacy mean for a person who never truly had any?

The Fourth Amendment acknowledges the right of each person to be protected from unreasonable searches and seizures by the government. This means public officials must have a court-ordered warrant before searching you and your belongings. And while the law applies only to the government, the culture it originated from expected privacy in their personal affairs as well.

It begs the question — if no one understands their right to privacy, will they fight for it as adults?

The market for school safety products and services is lucrative — its major clients are public schools (obviously) and state governments. In 2021, the industry was valued at $3 billion. With numerous stories reporting inaccuracies and even outright failures to ensure student safety, one might wonder if it is worth the price tag.

Utah rejected similar surveillance technology for adults five years ago when the attorney general’s office signed — then later canceled — a $21 million contract with the surveillance company Banjo. Similar to today’s companies that seek state-funded deals, it was revealed that Banjo’s services, which involved massive amounts of data collection from databases, public and private, were never as good as they were advertised to be.

Despite these concerns, companies continue striking new deals funded by taxpayer dollars. In fact, ZeroEyes successfully used an entire school district as its stepping stone to land a contract with the city of Hobbs, New Mexico. This will expand its coverage from 19 schools to a municipality with more than 40,000 people.

As we work toward improving student safety, public officials must think twice before readily handing over millions of dollars to companies offering highly invasive products and services to be used on children — especially when the technology has repeatedly been shown to be ineffective. Parents and community members need to be aware of the unseen costs that such infrastructure has on future generations of Americans. They need to be included in a school’s (or school district’s) decision to adopt such programs.

About the author

David Iglesias

David works as a State Government Affairs Associate at Libertas. He is responsible for partnerships with organizations and individuals interested in our innovative policies in much of the Eastern and Southern states of the country. Prior to Libertas, David studied economics at Loyola University in New Orleans, Louisiana during which time he authored various papers that would later be published by academic journals. He also served as a translator and liaison for humanitarian work to bring potable water to impoverished communities in Mexico and Guatemala. David currently resides in his home state of Utah. In his free time he enjoys working on music, riding motorcycles, and cooking.

Share Post:

Fighting for a Future Where Individuals Are Fully Liberated to Pursue Their Dreams, Free from Coercion and Control.

You Might Also Like

The Utah Fits All Scholarship program is still alive. This legal fight is far from over. But for now, Utah families can move forward.
What if we’d regulated the internet before Google, Amazon, or email even existed—are we about to make the same mistake with AI?
This ruling may feel like a full stop, but it’s only a pause. The fight to give Utah parents and kids education choice is far from over.

Help us Nail and Scale Policies to Reduce Government Control

Your tax-deductible contributions to Libertas Institute increase freedom across the country.

Libertas Institute
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.