Trump Says He’s Willing to Give Up Rights For Surveillance Legislation

In the News

This morning, the House of Representatives agreed to extend the sunset date for Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) by 10 days so members can continue to try and resolve the split between proponents of the highly controversial federal surveillance law, and their pro-privacy counterparts who argue that the Fourth Amendment requires that a search warrant be issued prior to any FISA queries. Section 702 of FISA, which is scheduled to sunset on April 20th, currently allows for warrantless, back-door surveillance of American citizens’ communications.The10-day extension is now headed to the Senate.

Here’s Our Take

The right to privacy is a foundational principle that contributed to the American Revolution, hence its inclusion as the Fourth Amendment. Yet, Congress and the Executive Branch continue to erode it year after year, regardless of which party is in control.

Amendments to require a search warrant prior to a FISA query were put forward on Tuesday by folks like Rep. Andy Biggs (AZ) and Rep. Thomas Massie (KY), unfortunately, those measures failed to move forward. FISA proponents and President Trump would rather “risk the giving up of [their] rights and privileges as a citizen” for the military. 

Closing

Libertas believes that, in a world that is now entirely digital and rife with surveillance technology, now is the time to stand up for the Fourth Amendment. We urge Congress to refrain from moving forward with what the Trump Administration describes as a  “clean” renewal of FISA, and American citizens to contact their Congressional representatives to request that they don’t accept this dirty deal.

Author Profile Image
About the author

David Iglesias

David is the Deputy Director of State Government Affairs at Libertas. He is responsible for partnerships with organizations and individuals interested in our innovative policies in much of the Eastern and Southern states of the country. Prior to Libertas, David studied economics at Loyola University in New Orleans, Louisiana during which time he authored various papers that would later be published by academic journals. He also served as a translator and liaison for humanitarian work to bring potable water to impoverished communities in Mexico and Guatemala. David currently resides in his home state of Utah. In his free time he enjoys working on music, riding motorcycles, and cooking.

Share Post:

Fighting for a Future Where Individuals Are Fully Liberated to Pursue Their Dreams, Free from Coercion and Control.

You Might Also Like

Utah's top 25% most-arrested homeless individuals cost Salt Lake City $51 million annually in shelter, police, court, and medical expenses. As lawmakers pour another $45.6 million into the system, organizations like The Other Side Village are already breaking the cycle through sobriety, accountability, and employment, without taxpayer funding. The data makes the case: expanding a broken system isn't the answer.
No, rent control doesn't work as supporters believe. Rather it treat symptoms while suppressing the signals that prompt more building, and lower costs.
A Twitch streamer made the moral case for stealing from corporations on the New York Times' podcast. As a former prosecutor, here's why that argument gets justice exactly backwards, and why the real victims are never corporations.

Help us Nail and Scale Policies to Reduce Government Control

Your tax-deductible contributions to Libertas Institute increase freedom across the country.